Yeah, so...why beat around the bush. Vaccines. Let's discuss.
A part of me has been dreading this post. One, it's going to take a long time to write this up (update: going on a week)- it's sort of like a mini research project. And two, I know that some of you are not going to like my views on the subject, and as I've learned, this topic can raise some pretty strong feelings. And guess what, I DO care what people think about me. I DON'T like to feel like people don't respect me. So I understand what I'm putting on the line here. It's worth it to me, because I am trusting that whether or not you agree or disagree, you can at least give me some kudos for spending the time to look into it. And really that's all I ask. Let's just look a little deeper into it, then you can take it with a grain of salt-- but this is an important decision, and at least let me assist you somewhat in guaranteeing that that decision is an informed one. Informed as in...you're getting ALL the information, not just partial bits and pieces of the truth
So GET COMFORTABLE, I know this is kind of overwhelming, this much information at once. Skim over it and read the things in bold if you want...either way, I promise you it will be worth your time. If you still think this is a bunch of bogus after you're done reading, that's fine-- but I don't know how you can come to that conclusion after learning the things that I've learned. And one more disclaimer..., I really REALLY don't like confrontation or debate. So it's hard for me to open my mouth on this subject. And if you don't agree with my opinion, that is OKAY, but I respect you enough not to attack your personal mothering decisions, and I hope you'll do the same for me. It's been a little bit painful to have people personally rip you apart for standing up for what you believe is right (for your child)- I won't lie, it hurts. The last time someone did it, a perfect stranger, it made my hands tremble. It was upsetting. But I feel better prepared with REAL SCIENCE to back me up. And my hope is that some of you will be more understanding about why people like me, choose not to follow the "suggested vaccine schedule." And I hope that some of you will take the time to look into exactly what is in the vaccines we are giving our children, and read the studies about how effective they are (not). I KNOW THAT I AM IN THE MINORITY HERE. (although the numbers of people who are supportive of this are growing every day. It doesn't take long to see what's really going on here.) I know that the majority of you will not agree with what I have to say. You might even decide you don't want your kids to play with my kids, since they are no longer vaccinated, and as people LOVE to point out, my kids are now a huge risk to your kids. (I think that's a little silly, but I respect your right to make decisions that you believe are best for your children.) I don't want you to feel like you have to defend yourself or your choices. But I DO feel the need to defend my choices, because the problem with this issue is that people are not fully informed or educated on what is going on with the vaccine industry right now. MY POINT IS: NO HATERS, OK? Be nice in your comments. (if you can't tell, I've had enough bad experiences with people basically ridiculing me for this-- so I'm a bit sensitive about sharing this with my friends.)
Now. Just to be clear. I DO believe that vaccines were intended to be helpful to us, and that in theory they are (WERE) a blessing to the world. Especially in foreign countries, etc. But what happened is that the vaccine manufactures (and others involved) got GREEDY- they saw BIG dollar signs and it turned into one huge money-making operating, and the health of our children is no longer their priority. In fact, they knowingly produce and manufacture things that will cause damage. THEY EVEN KNOW HOW TO MAKE VACCINES SAFER FOR US, BUT THEY (AS OF NOW) REFUSE TO DO IT. BECAUSE IT WILL TAKE AWAY A LOT OF THEIR PROFITS. Here's just one example. A recent investigation by Money Magazine reported that:
"For decades, American pharmaceutical companies have known how to produce the safer DPT vaccine but decided not to bring it to market because it would increase production costs and lower the drug’s 50% or higher profit margins."
But you and I really can make a difference- I've chosen to refuse these vaccines until they manufactures can give me better, safer, options. Let me share a bit of my backstory that brought me to this point. First let me tell you of my most recent experience in trying to share my point of view.
About 2 weeks ago, a friend/acquaintance from high school posted a link on his facebook page last week, kind of ripping on someone who claimed the HPV vaccine caused lifelong damage to her daughter. Since I don't know him that well, and certainly don't know his family or most of his friends, I decided to speak up and share my opinion.
I WAS BASICALLY EATEN ALIVE by his friends for voicing my opinion. What bothered me the MOST was that the main guy (not my friend from high school--his cousin or something) who was doing all the ridiculing/attacking absolutely REFUSED to even look into the studies I was suggesting. I'll quote him: "I'm not impressed by your 1000 "studies" either, nor do I have the time or inclination to research bogus claims when there's a clear and reliable scientific consensus in favor of vaccination."
You know what that attitude reminds me of? People on my mission- we'd ask them to simply read the Book of Mormon, and pray about it, and find out if it was true. Find out what's in there before you go bashing our religion! People LOVED to bash our beliefs and they LOVED to tell US what we believed- and they were always so far off, it was laughable. It was frustrating that these "bashers" would never actually listen to us teach, or read the book... because they were so sure that they "already knew" what we believe- or else they thought we were brainwashed, or whatever- I used to think to myself, WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE by gathering more information? Nothing- you only stand to gain from the education, and then you can say you honestly looked at all sides, and came to your own conclusion. I believe that a lot of people are too afraid to really look into my religion, because they are afraid of what they'll find- afraid that it might turn out to be true. So, on that note, I wish people wouldn't be so afraid to look into this subject. I wish they wouldn't be so quick to just blindly believe what they read in Parenting Magazine or on that pamphlet in their doctors office.
Ok, so back to the facebook thing. I had shared with everyone that before they be to quick to attack me, to please just research the other side of the argument, and to take a look at this book called Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Parents and Health Practitioners. It is a book written by Neil Miller, a medical research journalist by profession. It is 560 pages long and cites over 1000 studies that have been done all over the world, not just the U.S., over the years. Most of these studies have been published in peer-reviewed medical journals. (Meaning they were definitely done properly and were reviewed by other medical professionals before being published.) The things he found from all these studies, well, they are jaw-dropping. You can hardly believe it-- it is extremely compelling evidence to show that our current vaccines ARE NOT SAFE TO BE GIVING TO OUR CHILDREN, and are not working as well as we are being led to believe- thus, the risk is NOT outweighing the benefit. I cannot accept the recommended schedule that is being pushed on us today. Now before you get all huffy and say, "My doctor knows best, and he says they're safe!" Well, just hear me out, and take a look at this research. Take it to your doctor if you want, but just take a look and decide for yourself.
I didn't always feel this way. I was raised in a family that believed in vaccines, and all my siblings got their shots, and now they give their own kids the shots as well. I was a FIRM believer in them when Kalia was born...but to be honest, I knew almost NOTHING about them, except they were supposed to help my baby not get diseases. And she was my whole world, and I would do anything to keep her safe, so there was no room for argument on the matter.
My husband was raised in a family that is much more into homeopathic and natural medicine. He tried to very kindly hint that he didn't think the vaccines were the right way to go. But he didn't push it. I almost laughed at him, and even remember saying to myself, "Ha- yeah right, I am the one who takes her to all her appointments, so he can't stop me from vaccinating her!" He kept mentioning it though, as she got the Hep B shot at birth, and then the 2 month, and 4 month shots. At that time, I got sick of him bringing it up, more specifically, he wanted to talk about how the rate of autism is sky rocketing, correlating with the increase of vaccines throughout the years. So, I set out to prove him wrong. I am a master researcher, especially online. I can find almost ANYTHING out there. I knew that the simplest way to debunk his autism theory would be to find a study or even a simple observation about autistic children who were NOT vaccinated. That way I could say, "See, non-vaccinated kids get autism too."
The weirdest thing happened. I couldn't find ANYTHING OF THE KIND. I researched for hours, wondering why on earth I couldn't find info on non-vaccinated autistic kids. In fact, the real kick in the pants was that I found a published study that found that Amish people (the ones who still drive horse and buggy's instead of cars, and don't use electricity or modern technology, etc)- well, they also don't vaccinate their children. And guess what- there are no autistic kids among them! (actually, I believe that there exactly two autistic children among them at the time, and both had been adopted and most likely vaccinated before the adoption.)
(Later, I found out that they are not the only population who has these results. An organization called Homefirst Health Services, an alternative medical facility where babies are often delivered at home and are rarely vaccinated, shared that after caring for 30-35,000 children, they did not have any autistic children among them. In addition, there is "virtually no cases of childhood asthma, in contrast to the overall Blue Cross rate of childhood asthma, which is about 10%." (p.238)
Sidenote: If you are worried about autism, you probably should be. The rates have increased to an average of 1 out of 150 children (mostly boys) are getting autism these days. In Utah, the rate is even higher- it's about 1 out of 77 children. (!!!!!) The rate doubled from 2002-2008, and has increased TWENTY-FOLD in the last twenty years.
This is where I finally took a step back and said, "Could I actually be wrong about this?"
It was a stunning moment. I decided to keep searching. A lot of the research seemed to say that while autism IS something that is because of genetics, it seems like there was some kind of TRIGGER that was setting off that gene. And that could be anything from the preservatives like aluminum, mercury, or in the vaccines, or maybe the viruses themselves- but I knew that something was not right, and I needed more time to research it. Conveniently, we moved from Hawaii to Las Vegas and lost our health insurance (Samuel was self-employed) so that made my decision to hold off on vaccines even easier- because I quit taking Kalia to the doctor unless she was really sick.
I kept researching. I had no idea that the vaccine schedule today was attempting to put TRIPLE the amount of vaccines/drugs/shots into my baby than was ever injected in me. THREE TIMES AS MANY? Yeah...that's weird, I thought. Why would my baby need so many more shots when most of these diseases were already disappearing on their own? Why can't she just get chicken pox, instead of getting inoculated against it? I had chicken pox as a little girl, I have a lovely scar on my forehead to prove it. But it was no big deal! Why so many vaccines??? Anyway, I started to put some pieces together.
And I admitted to my dear husband that, gulp, I just might have been wrong after all. (Hey, I don't like to admit it, but it is what it is.) He was gracious in accepting my confession, and asked me to keep sharing the things that I continued to find.
By the time Annie was born, which was only about 8 months after this, we signed a waiver at the hospital to make sure she didn't get the Hepatitis B shot.
Ok, time out. I am not going to do this with every vaccine I mentioned, but lets just talk for a minute about the Hep B shot. Do you know how you contract Hepatitis B? Through body fluids- blood, saliva, and semen, and also by sharing needles with an infected person. Or an infected mother can pass it to her baby at birth. 50% of people get it by being sexually active. PRETTY SURE my baby isn't going to get it. But JUST IN SOME WEIRD case that she was injected with a dirty needle, the statistics show that most patients who do get it do not require hospitalization, and 95% of them recover completely. "True carriers of the virus represent less than one-tenth of one percent of the population...In 2005, there were only FIVE cases of hepatitis B in children under 5 years of age in the United States." So if it's so rare, and relatively not that harmful, WHY are they insisting on giving it to every newborn that is born? Allow me to quote from the book: "Because a vaccination strategy limited to high-risk individuals has failed" (the high-risk individuals being the druggies and the sexually promiscuous folks) and since children are "accessible," they are now compelled to receive the three-shot series beginning at birth." In other words, because high-risk groups are difficult to reach or have rejected this vaccines, authorities are targeting babies- even though babies are not likely to contract this disease. They are being subjected to all of the risks of this vaccine without the expected benefit."" ) p. 312
Well, what are the risks of the shot? Man, I can't even sum it all up, for one because there are almost 40 pages of studies and personal testimony of the damage that one vaccine has done- everything from sensory impairments, blood disorders, arthritis, autoimmune and neurological disorders, diabetes, skin disorders, and liver and kidney damage, but here's a quick study you can take a peek at from 2009, showing that the Hep B vaccine triples the risk of autism in infant boys.
And so you take that risk, give your baby this vaccine, hoping to get an "expected benefit" and guess what- it's not even very effective in what it's supposed to do. "Follow-up studies found that just 5 to 9 years later, approximately half of all vaccinated people fail to maintain protective antibody levels." (p. 311).
Well, just with that small bit of information, I decided that Annie definitely did not need the Hep B vaccine. And looking back, I'm even MORE grateful that I didn't give it to her, because she has all those food allergies and sensitivities, and frankly is scares me to think of how her body would react to the crazy stuff in vaccines (more on that in a second.)
So as an alternative to the regular vaccine schedule, I found an "alternate vaccine schedule" by a certain Dr. Don Miller, that suggested you wait until the child is 2 years old before administering any vaccines, (because their immune systems are stronger, and they have a little more body weight to distribute the drugs and preservatives) and then after that, to make sure the shots are separated (no combined shots like DTaP or MMR- those are like 3 shots combined into one) and that you don't do any vaccines that inject a live virus. He suggested you do these shots:
a. Pertussis (acellular, not whole cell)
b. Diphtheria
c. Tetanus
d. Polio (the Salk vaccine, cultured in human cells)
(Translation: That's the DTap shot, separated, plus polio.) "The top four would be the pertussis (acelluar — aP — not whole cell), diphtheria (D), and tetanus (T) vaccines — given separately (not together, as is usually the case); and the Salk polio vaccine, with an inactivated (dead) virus, one that is cultured in human cells, not monkey kidney cells. Perhaps it should only contain these four vaccines.
So that was my plan. Wait until the girls were at least two years old, and then do those shots, every six months. There's just one little problem. If you want the shots separated, they come containing mercury/thimersol (in case you didn't know, there IS a correlation between mercury/thimersol and autism, and so we've been told that the CDC removed all the mercury from our vaccines. Apparently that's not quite the truth.) So that same doctor, actually said this in an update to his suggested schedule. "it will be impossible, unfortunately, to follow the ‘user friendly’ vaccination schedule as written... the risk of the combined DPT vaccine, even after age two, outweighs its benefits, so it is better to do without these shots.” (See this webpage if you want more information on this schedule or the reasons why he suggests it.)I didn't know this info until recently- Since Kalia is 4 and Annie is almost 3, I decided it was time to start the alternative schedule. I found the book by Neil Miller, and checked it out to decide which vaccine to give them first...but after finding out what I did...I absolutely could not feel good about giving them any of them-- and my delayed schedule has turned into a "no vaccine" schedule. At least for now. I had originally planned to give them both the Pertussis vaccine.
I had heard about the Pertussis breaking out in Utah and California, and my brother and sister-in-law actually caught it and got really sick! (their little girl, who was vaccinated, did not catch it. The vaccine worked as it was supposed to.) Pertussis is scary because there is no specific treatment for it, and antibiotics have little effect on it. and it makes you feel pretty horrible. So after I checked out the book, I skipped straight to the chapter on the Pertussis vaccine. And I was sick to my stomach at what I learned. I decided there was no way I could give my kids the vaccine. Here's a few reasons why:
*Pertussis is rarely fatal, although doctors will use some scare tactics to try to scare you into getting the vaccine. (Having said that, it is most dangerous to those under 6 months of age.)
*The US never studied it's safety on children. "They injected the vaccine into the bellies of young mice to see if they would die. If the mice lived and gained weight, the vaccine was considered safe and was approved by the FDA." They also relied on a study done by Great Britain, who wasn't even testing for safety, they were testing for EFFICACY. 42 of these children had convulsions within 28 days of the vaccine, AND they used babies 6-18 months old- yet somehow the FDA decides that means it's safe to give to little 2 month old baby who weighs 10 lbs the SAME DOSE that you would give a 50 lb child going into preschool.
*One study found that 1 in 600 children had neurological problems after the vaccine, and another study found that 1 in 200 who received the full series of the shots suffered severe reactions like shock-collapse or convulsions. (These results show much higher incidences of complications than your doctor or the FDA will ever tell you.)
*A published study in 1994 showed that children with asthma were FIVE TIMES more likely to have received the Pertussis vaccine. a 1997 study found that 20% of the subjects given the vaccine went on to develop asthma, and NONE of the subjects in the control group did.
*Let's talk SIDS- one of the things Mommies fear the most-
In Japan from 1970 to 1974 there were 37 documented deaths following the pertussis vaccinations. Doctors boycotted the vaccine and in 1975 Japan authorities raised the age of vaccination from two months to two years. As a result, babies stopped dying unexpectedly, and the Japanese infant mortality rate improved from 17th place to best in the world.
*In 1987 the American Journal of Public Health published a study that found "the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization." and a 1993 study reported that babies die at a rate 8 times greater than normal within 3 days of the shot.
*An Australian study studied breathing patterns before and after the administration of the Pertussis vaccine, and found that the vaccine "caused an inordinate increase in episodes where breathing either nearly ceased or stopped completely."
Here's a real kicker: "In another study of children who dies of SIDS, Dr. William Torch found that two-thirds had been vaccinated with pertussis prior to death.
Soooooo....nobody is claiming that the Pertussis vaccine CAUSES SIDS, but it sure as heck looks like it CONTRIBUTED MAJORLY to it. SO SCARY!
*The book also shows all these other side effects which are common with vaccines: Developmental disabilities, neurological problems, and even some side effects that surprised me: Higher incidences of violent crimes and drug abuse when they were older. There are plenty of studies on all of those, but I won't waste time summarizing them.
Then I went on to read about how effective the vaccine is- and if it was worth taking those risks or not. First of all, the trends show that Pertussis was already majorly on the decline when the vaccine was introduced. After that, it kept declining at the exact same rate as it had before they started giving it (p. 138).
*Two Swedish studies found the vaccine to be 54 and 64 percent effective, respectively.
*A 2006 Canadian study suggests that the vaccine might not protect young children.
*a 2007 published study found that five years after adolescents received the booster shot (their 5th dose by 11-13 years of age) their pertussis antibody levels were actually LOWER that they were before vaccination. In fact, they were undetectable in 28 percent of the subjects.)
*In 1986 there was a breakout of pertussis (over 1000 cases) in Kansas, and "90 percent of the patients were adequately vaccinated" and yet somehow they still caught it.
*In a 1993 outbreak, 82% of younger children stricken with the disease had received multiple doses of the vaccine.
*In a Canadian outbreak that same year, 62% of the people who contracted Pertussis had been adequately vaccinated against it.
*In a US outbreak in 1996, 97% of children were up to date on their vaccines, and yet 74% of the children who caught it had had 3-5 doses of the vaccine.
*In Israel, for the 3 years after they introduced the vaccine (2003-2005), Pertussis actually increased among their people.
So you see, Pertussis outbreaks often occur in highly vaccinated popoulations, and the majority of the people who catch it ARE THE VACCINATED ONES! (craziness. I was stunned.)
Well, that was ENOUGH FOR ME! More than enough, actually. I decided not to vaccinate my kids with the Pertussis vaccine. Way too much risk, without much of a benefit. And the scary part is that "according to Dr. David Kessler, former director of the FDA, 'only about one percent of serious adverse drug reactions are reported.'" (p. 25) So...the risks with all vaccines are probably much, much higher than even these numbers represent.
I have only read a small fraction of the book, but every single vaccine has similar information- studies, side effects, efficacy information....from what I can tell, it's the same story being told over and over and over. I will save us all the time and try not to be redundant and summarize every single vaccine. (you're welcome)- although I am more than happy to look up specific statistics for any of you, if you want more info on a specific vaccine that you had in mind. I intend to read the entire book, no matter how long it takes. I just want as much information as possible.
******
We, as parents, need to understand that VACCINES ARE DRUGS. "Each one contains a blend of chemicals, pathogens, and other foreign matter. Today, children...are injected with 36 vaccine-drugs before he or she is 1 1/2 years old! These babies are not ingesting the drugs (like we do...traveling through our stomachs), but are being injected directly into their tiny bloodstreams. When did YOU last take eight drugs all at the same time? Would you be more surprised if you DID or DID NOT have a serious reaction?
The United States is the most vaccinated country in the world, yet it has one of the worst infant mortality rates of industrialized nations. In fact, as new vaccines are added to the recommended vaccine schedule, the infant mortality rate worsens.
Let me share what exactly is in that vaccine that they are injecting into your baby:
VERO (monkey) cells -- potentially containing the SV40 virus incriminated in several different cancers, including leukemia.
Bovine extract, bovine casein and calf (bovine) sera -- It is common knowledge that bovine blood products can be contaminated with viruses, and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is the one most often contaminating fetal bovine serum.[7]
Formaldehyde -- a chemical that has caused cancer in laboratory animals and may cause cancer in humans. There is no known threshold level below which cancer risk does not exist. The World Health Organization recommends that exposure should not exceed 0.05 ppm (parts per million).[8]
Glutaraldehyde -- a toxic chemical that is used for cold sterilization of medical and dental equipment. There is no Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends that exposure to glutaraldehyde be under 0.2 ppm.[9] (TOM: reference)
2-Phenoxyethanol -- the chemical name for antifreeze, the vaccine contains 2.5 mg of this compound.
Thimerosal -- this mercury compound is used in the production of Energix, the hepatitis B fraction of the vaccine. It is used during the initial manufacturing process and then removed by a process using cystiene. However, up to 12.5ng (nanograms) remain.
The vaccine also contains these substances: neomycin, polymyxin B, polysorbate 80 and less than five percent yeast protein. The instructions on the package insert caution to "shake well before administering" and describe the vaccine as a "turbid white suspension" consisting of the many particles in the solution.
Is this something that you would want to have injected into your arm? Into your baby's arm? Don't bet on it. The long-term studies on combination vaccines will most likely prove that the biological warfare coming through a needle is just that: war -- on the immune system.
Have you ever thought that maybe vaccines could actually be detrimental to our immune system? I had never thought of that, until I read this:
"The viruses that cause measles, mumps, and chickenpox have infected countless generations of humans, akin to a rite of passage for each member of our species. Contracting these diseases strengthens both parts of the adaptive immune system (Th1 and Th2 ). Mothers who have had measles, mumps, and chickenpox transfer antibodies against them to their babies in utero, which protect them during the first year of life from contracting these infections."
also...
(On the need for booster shots): "With natural immunity, which is acquired by being exposed to the actual disease, protection is not meager and temporary, but rather complete and lifelong. This is not true with vaccines. Isn't it odd that the vaccine industry's answer to an ineffective vaccine is to compel more of it!" (p. 29)
With rare exception, a well-nourished child who contracts measles will recover smoothly from the infection. Fifty years ago almost all children in the U.S. had measles. And after contracting this disease, one has life-long immunity to it. The protection provided by vaccination is temporary.
*****************************
Another thing to be aware of is that more often than not, the vaccines are contaminated. Often, one batch of vaccine will not cause too many problems, but another batch will cause major side effects and even death- and who knows which batch YOUR child is getting? "Studies have shown that 60 percent of vaccines examined contained one or more contaminating organisms." And when they say contamination, they mean viruses that aren't supposed to be there.
*****************************
As I mentioned before, we are told that vaccines are much more effective than they really are. When the HPV vaccine came out, we were actually told that it was 100% effective, leading us to believe that anyone who got the Gardasil vaccine would have no chance of having cervical cancer. However, the vaccine is only "100 percent effective" against two strains of HPV, and there are actually numerous different ones. In fact, in the pre-licensure studies, 361 women who received at least one shot of Gardasil went on to develop precancerous lesions within three years.
This is not just a problem with the HPV vaccine. The pneumococcal vaccine (prevnar) is only designed to protect against SEVEN of the NINETY different strains that can cause pneumococcal disease. Not only that, but the seven strains that the vaccine prevents are just being replaced by are more dangerous and resistant to treatment. (p. 28)
***********
Another argument I hear a lot (because a lot of good people, pediatricians included), believe in Herd Immunity. "One of the grand lies of the vaccine program is the concept of "herd immunity." It is based on the idea that if a certain percentage of the population is immunized against an infectious disease, epidemics can be prevented. The exact percentage changes, mainly, in my opinion, to suit the vaccine manufacturers. In the beginning it was 68 percent, but now some are calling for 95 to 100 percent immunization to reach these goals. We are constantly told, and many doctors believe, that herd immunity has prevented epidemics from occurring in modern America. Unfortunately, there is very little evidence of this for a number of reasons. .....vaccines for most Americans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of the vaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well as others in the developed world, herd immunity doesn't exist and hasn't for over 60 years." Also, a lot of people are getting pretty upset with people like me, claiming that us 'unvaccinated folks' are causing these outbreaks of epidemics. Well, it turns out we're not. The outbreaks that you see are following their normal patterns. OUTBREAKS happen, regardless of how well a population is vaccinated (as shown above, the vaccinated don't have that great of protection anyway). "The belief in herd immunity leads to many delusions. One of them is that when the number of immune people in a community drops below a certain point, it will make the next epidemic come sooner. In 1976 in Britain the vaccination rate for whooping cough dropped from 76% to 42%, because there had been publicity of bad side effects from the vaccine. The medicrats expected that the drop in the vaccination rate would make the next whooping cough epidemic come sooner, as well as expecting it to be worse. The whooping cough bacteria paid no attention to human theories, and the disease followed the usual timing of its natural cycle of virulence. Medicrats expressed surprise that the epidemic did not come sooner. There were also fewer cases and fewer deaths during this epidemic. The much lower vaccination rate of 42% made no difference to the long term decline of whooping cough, which had been happening for a hundred years.
One more quote on herd immunity: ""The reason vaccinations are promoted with such intensity is to prevent people from realizing that vaccines do not protect and also in the event of an outbreak or an epidemic the vaccinated are as much at risk of becoming infected as the unvaccinated. The truth can be kept hidden if people's vaccination status remains unknown and if everyone is vaccinated, making a comparison with unvaccinated people impossible. This is also the real reason for the relentless push to vaccinate as many children as possible."-- Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite "Protective" Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p101)
If you have chosen to vaccinate based on the idea that immunity, but would like more studies and statistics on the subject, click HERE.
I want to mention one more thing before I end. I know it's a little hard (at first) to believe that our government is lying to us about this. I mean, these vaccine organizations sound SO GOOD and HELPFUL! The CDC? (Center for Disease Control) and the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) should be on our side, right? As well as our family pediatrican, whom we love?? Right? Well--let me enlighten you just a little about why they might have some ulterior motives.
Forgive me, but I feel that a scripture from the Doctrine and Covenants summarizes it perfectly (this is in Section 89, verse 4- right as the Word of Wisdom is given.)
4 Behold, verily, thus saith the Lord unto you: In consequence of aevils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of bconspiring men in the last days, I have cwarned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this word of wisdom by revelation—
I will tell you why you're not getting the truth:
Evils...designs...in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days. The world is consumed with it's lust for power and money.
The fact is: The vaccine industry used to be made up of about 35 different manufactures. Today, there are only about 5 manufacturers, producing ALL the vaccines for the United States. Think of the MONEY they are making! Think like any business person- money is made when you are bringing in more money than you are spending. Think about how much money there is to be made by those companies, when there are millions of children, multiplied by the millions of shots being given. Let's not forget the flu shots and the swine flu shots- (again, lots of scare tactics used to motivate people to get in there and get them!) They stand to lose a fortune if anything came out that showed how dangerous these vaccines are. And interestingly enough, the CDC’s former director, Dr. Julie Gerberding—who was essentially in charge of federal government decision-making about vaccines and disease-response programs—resigned in 2010 to become president of Merck Pharmaceuticals’ vaccine division. Merck is the maker of the HPV vaccine. You see things like this EVERYWHERE The whole vaccine industry is motivated by obscene profits. They're in bed together. I can't put it any more plainly than that.
Oh there's much more on that topic-
Recently in the news, the American Academy of Pediatrics accepted a $342,000 payment from Wyeth, the maker of the pneumococcal vaccine, which is worth about 2 billion dollars a year in sales. The AAP also took $433,000 from Merck the year they endorsed the controversial HPV vaccine (which is expected to bring in billions of dollars in profits) and is currently being pushed on little girls as young as nine. Sanofi Aventis, a pharmaceutical company that makes 17 vaccines and the new 5-in-1 combo shot that was recently added to the childhood vaccination schedule, is also one of the AAP's top donors, purports CBS News.
And we absolutely cannot depend on information from the CDC. There is just too great a conflict of interest. "Asking the CDC to look into vaccine safety is like asking the fox to guard the chicken coop."--Dr Bernard Rimland. "In the past 7-10 years, the CDC has manipulated data, hidden results, purchased studies, and deceived parents, pediatricians, and politicians in a blatant act of self-preservation and pharmaceutical industry protectionism."
As I mentioned before, these organizations DO know that vaccines cause a problem, and if you REALLY want to know if that's true, spend some time browsing the documents dug up by this website:
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/index2.html
You will find that not only do they know about all these problems, they are going to great lengths to cover it up, including creating and designing their own studies to produce the results that they want. (I could go on and on about the studies they have manufactured, produced, and even conducted on their own- then they pay doctors large amounts of money to put their name on the study and publish it as their own. Close examination of these studies of "vaccine study" finds all KINDS of problems with their research. "Lead authors of important studies are often beholden to the manufacturer in some way. They may own stock in the company or are paid by the manufacturer to travel around the country promoting their vaccines. Lead authors may receive consultation fees, grants, or other benefits from the drug maker that contravene ethical boundaries and compromise the integrity of the study....In some instances, study results may be preordained. When the vaccine-autism link became a public concern, vaccine proponents moved into high gear to produce authentic-appearing studies that contradicted genuine data. (The tobacco industry did this same thing many years ago, when the tobacco industries financed numerous bogus studies ostensibly "proving" that cigarettes didn't cause cancer.) (p. 23)
In fact, Congress established a "hazard" tax on childhood vaccines, so that when you (and your insurance) pays for your own baby's shots, a portion of that money goes into a special fund to compensate them when their children are seriously damaged or die. In the last few years, more than $1 billion was granted for thousands of injuries and deaths caused by mandated vaccines. (p.25)
The CDC has told us that there are now (I'm paraphrasing) about 16 studies that "refute" the link between vaccines and autism. Those studies are INVENTED and MANIPULATED and there are WAY more studies proving otherwise. They went crazy with a smear campaign on Dr. Wakefield, one of the original doctors who found and published the link- they basically destroyed his career for having the guts to go against the grain with his findings- and they threaten others who try to do the same. Again, refer to some of the websites I've mentioned throughout this post if you don't believe me. It is all there waiting to be found, if you'll JUST LOOK AND SEE.
Well, what about the doctors, you say? These people are SMART and have been through MEDICAL school! They should know right? They should know how to find these studies.
First of all, did you know that doctors only study the immune system, IN DEPTH, while they are in their first year of medical school? Also, pediatricans know a lot about childhood issues, but they do not know a whole lot about the brain. One neuologist (who wrote the introduction to Neil Miller's book) says that as a brain specialist, he realized that pediatricians actually know very little about the brain- he was constantly getting phone calls with questions because that is just not their area of expertise. And that's part of the problem. Vaccines cause a lot of problems for the brain, including sometime called "exotoxicity".
I believe that our doctors may still believe that the CDC and FDA and AAP are honest and are telling them the truth. They feel like with these huge organizations backing them up, they have a lot more credibility. But, as I've watched things progress throughout the years, a LOT more doctors have finally decided to do what I have done (find out for themselves if these vaccines are damaging) and many doctors are coming to the conclusion that the vaccines really ARE dangerous.
It's a tough pill to swall0w- because by admitting this, your doctor is at risk of losing patients (who don't agree) or by losing a great amount of his/her own income. Yes, even your doctor has a financial interest in vaccines, as he/she makes a large profit off of every shot given to every child. He/she could lose a great many clients over this issue, so why not play it safe and go with the mainstream theory here? So they don't want to see that money-maker taken away either. I know we love our doctors and trust them implicitly, but it seems that most pediatricians have ALSO refused to look into this subject- as one article put it, "That would be akin to the priest denying his own religion."
However, I was extremely grateful to meet the famous pediatrician Doris Rapp, who is an expert on children with allergies. She wrote a book called Is This Your Child that has been incredibly helpful and informative to me, with my kids having allergies and sensitivities, and jacked up immune systems. I personally asked her what she thought of vaccines. I will quote her exactly, "Oh, I wouldn't even vaccinate my dog right now." Also, the doctors office I attend just added a brand new doctor to their staff, who told me privately that she has read studies that show that vaccines are not very effective. So I know that doctors are starting to see the light on this subject. I believe it will just be a matter of time before this previously thought "crack pot" theory is realized to be one of substance and truth.
I know some of you might want to know what to do when your preschooler or kindergartner is "required" to produce a vaccine record, showing that their shots are up to date. Don't worry, we still have enough freedom left in this country to not have to be compelled to do something we don't believe in. Every state has waivers that you can sign, stating that for medical or religious reasons, you have decided not to vaccinate.
For me, it is a religious reason. We've considered this information and prayed about it, and this is what we feel good about, for our family, Who knows, maybe things will be different when our kids are older and bigger.
I think all of us who HAVE vaccinated our kids at one time in the past-- we need to be extremely grateful that our children have been blessed to not have any major side effects of vaccines. It is possible that they have suffered a little bit of damage that we don't know about. And I personally know two children who have suffered greatly after receiving vaccines. One of my friends has a little girl who spent a MONTH in the ICU following a regular swine flu vaccine. She regressed from being a normal 4 year old to being in an almost-vegetable state, unable to talk, feed herself, or go to the bathroom. She was life-and-death for a little while- they didn't think she was going to make it. She was miraculously saved, and was finally discharged from the hospital, and has started to recover from the brain damage that vaccine caused. So those "stories" you hear about people having serious reactions, well, they aren't just made up stories or crazy people making crazy claims. These things are happening all around us. I know doctors and other people will probably make you feel like YOU ARE A BAD MOTHER if you are not giving your children the precious, protective vaccines...but be careful believing that kind of pressure, or their scare tactics. Like I said, it seems to be heavily motivated by the money.
*The vaccine industry, who says "our vaccines are safe!" will LOSE MONEY if people stop vaccinating. On the other hand, the other side tells us that they are DANGEROUS, and I ask you to consider one more question: WHO STANDS TO LOSE (OR PROFIT) THE MOST FROM VACCINES? How much can we really believe what they are telling us? Those who are suggesting that vaccines are bad, really stand TO GAIN NOTHING from a less-vaccinated population. Maybe some of you can think of something they would gain from it, but I can't think of anything.
I have to stop. I know this is a lot to take in. Congrats if you made it all the way to the end, I hope it helps in someway, somehow. Don't be afraid of the facts, and don't be afraid to go against the grain. If you don't like the opposition you face, then do what I did at first. Find a doctor who will support you in making your own decisions, and then keep your mouth shut when the topic comes up in your circle of friends or even family (if you don't want people ripping into you.) That's the easiest way...don't make waves. That is, until you finally gather enough information (and courage) to take those people on. That's the point I am finally at today...well...almost. I'm not ready to fight with my friends over it! I'm still putting it out there for some of you to...ponder. Hope it helped someone out there.
xoxo
Heather


